On Sat, 2010-03-27 at 13:44 +0100, Martin Langhoff wrote: > On Sat, Mar 27, 2010 at 7:58 AM, Yioryos Asprobounitis > <[email protected]> wrote: > > I'll go with Mikus on that. > > With at least 3 development streams some qualifier is needed in the naming. > > eg os115x1/os115x15/os115py > > +1 -- and remember to keep it all 8.3 :-)
Done: the next image will be called something like "os117py.img" I've always wondered why the XO builds don't have a real name. Everyone seems to generically refer to them as "OS". For some time, I've been calling it "xoos", then I realized I was the only one and gave up. Analogously, f11-xo1 is hardly pronounceable and f11-xo1-py is even worse. Where's Steve Jobs when we need him? -- // Bernie Innocenti - http://codewiz.org/ \X/ Sugar Labs - http://sugarlabs.org/ _______________________________________________ Devel mailing list [email protected] http://lists.laptop.org/listinfo/devel
