I added some result to https://github.com/open-mpi/2016-summer-perf-testing

The result shows much better performance from 2.0.0 and master over 1.10.3 for 
vader. The test ran with Artem’s version of benchmark on OB1, single node, bind 
to socket. 

We should have a place to discuss/comment/collaborate on results. Should I open 
an issue on that repo? So we can have github style commenting/referencing.


Arm




On 7/28/16, 3:02 PM, "devel on behalf of Jeff Squyres (jsquyres)" 
<devel-boun...@lists.open-mpi.org on behalf of jsquy...@cisco.com> wrote:

>On Jul 28, 2016, at 6:28 AM, Artem Polyakov <artpo...@gmail.com> wrote:
>> 
>> Jeff and others,
>> 
>> 1. The benchmark was updated to support shared memory case.
>> 2. The wiki was updated with the benchmark description: 
>> https://github.com/open-mpi/ompi/wiki/Request-refactoring-test#benchmark-prototype
>
>Sweet -- thanks!
>
>> Let me know if we want to put this prototype to some general place. I think 
>> it makes sense.
>
>I just created:
>
>    https://github.com/open-mpi/2016-summer-perf-testing
>
>Want to put it there?
>
>Arm just ran a bunch of tests today and will be committing a bunch of results 
>in there shortly.
>
>-- 
>Jeff Squyres
>jsquy...@cisco.com
>For corporate legal information go to: 
>http://www.cisco.com/web/about/doing_business/legal/cri/
>
>_______________________________________________
>devel mailing list
>devel@lists.open-mpi.org
>https://rfd.newmexicoconsortium.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
_______________________________________________
devel mailing list
devel@lists.open-mpi.org
https://rfd.newmexicoconsortium.org/mailman/listinfo/devel

Reply via email to