Hi Artem, Thanks for the links. I tested now with 1.10.3, 2.0.0+sm/vader performance regression patch under https://github.com/hjelmn/ompi/commit/4079eec9749e47dddc6acc9c0847b3091601919f.patch and master. I will do the 2.0.1rc in the next days as well.
Is it possible to add me to the results repository at github or should I fork and request you to pull? Best Christoph ----- Original Message ----- From: "Artem Polyakov" <artpo...@gmail.com> To: "Open MPI Developers" <devel@lists.open-mpi.org> Sent: Tuesday, August 23, 2016 5:13:30 PM Subject: Re: [OMPI devel] Performance analysis proposal Hi, Christoph Please, check https://github.com/open-mpi/ompi/wiki/Request-refactoring-test for the testing methodology and https://github.com/open-mpi/2016-summer-perf-testing for examples and launch scripts. 2016-08-23 21:20 GMT+07:00 Christoph Niethammer < nietham...@hlrs.de > : Hello, I just came over this and would like to contribute some results from our system(s). Are there any specific configure options you want to see enabled beside --enable-mpi-thread-multiple? How to commit results? Best Christoph Niethammer ----- Original Message ----- From: "Arm Patinyasakdikul (apatinya)" < apati...@cisco.com > To: "Open MPI Developers" < devel@lists.open-mpi.org > Sent: Friday, July 29, 2016 8:41:06 PM Subject: Re: [OMPI devel] Performance analysis proposal Hey Artem, all, Thank you for the benchmark prototype. I have created the discussion page here : https://github.com/open-mpi/2016-summer-perf-testing/issues/1 . * There, I have single threaded and multithreaded performance posted. * The script I used is now in the repo (also in the discussion page) * Result with openib will come up probably next week. I have to access UTK machine for that. * I did some test and yes, I have seen some openib hang in multithreaded case. Thank you, Arm From: devel < devel-boun...@lists.open-mpi.org > on behalf of Artem Polyakov < artpo...@gmail.com > Reply-To: Open MPI Developers < devel@lists.open-mpi.org > Date: Thursday, July 28, 2016 at 10:42 PM To: Open MPI Developers < devel@lists.open-mpi.org > Subject: Re: [OMPI devel] Performance analysis proposal Thank you, Arm! Good to have vader results (I haven't tried it myself yet). Few comments/questions: 1. I guess we also want to have 1-threaded performance for the "baseline" reference. 2. Have you tried to run with openib, as I mentioned on the call I had some problems with it and I'm curious if you can reproduce in your environment. Github issue sounds good for me! 2016-07-29 12:30 GMT+07:00 Arm Patinyasakdikul (apatinya) < apati...@cisco.com > : I added some result to https://github.com/open-mpi/2016-summer-perf-testing The result shows much better performance from 2.0.0 and master over 1.10.3 for vader. The test ran with Artem’s version of benchmark on OB1, single node, bind to socket. We should have a place to discuss/comment/collaborate on results. Should I open an issue on that repo? So we can have github style commenting/referencing. Arm On 7/28/16, 3:02 PM, "devel on behalf of Jeff Squyres (jsquyres)" < devel-boun...@lists.open-mpi.org on behalf of jsquy...@cisco.com > wrote: >On Jul 28, 2016, at 6:28 AM, Artem Polyakov < artpo...@gmail.com > wrote: >> >> Jeff and others, >> >> 1. The benchmark was updated to support shared memory case. >> 2. The wiki was updated with the benchmark description: >> https://github.com/open-mpi/ompi/wiki/Request-refactoring-test#benchmark-prototype >> > >Sweet -- thanks! > >> Let me know if we want to put this prototype to some general place. I think >> it makes sense. > >I just created: > > https://github.com/open-mpi/2016-summer-perf-testing > >Want to put it there? > >Arm just ran a bunch of tests today and will be committing a bunch of results >in there shortly. > >-- >Jeff Squyres > jsquy...@cisco.com >For corporate legal information go to: >http://www.cisco.com/web/about/doing_business/legal/cri/ > >_______________________________________________ >devel mailing list > devel@lists.open-mpi.org > https://rfd.newmexicoconsortium.org/mailman/listinfo/devel _______________________________________________ devel mailing list devel@lists.open-mpi.org https://rfd.newmexicoconsortium.org/mailman/listinfo/devel -- С Уважением, Поляков Артем Юрьевич Best regards, Artem Y. Polyakov _______________________________________________ devel mailing list devel@lists.open-mpi.org https://rfd.newmexicoconsortium.org/mailman/listinfo/devel _______________________________________________ devel mailing list devel@lists.open-mpi.org https://rfd.newmexicoconsortium.org/mailman/listinfo/devel -- С Уважением, Поляков Артем Юрьевич Best regards, Artem Y. Polyakov _______________________________________________ devel mailing list devel@lists.open-mpi.org https://rfd.newmexicoconsortium.org/mailman/listinfo/devel _______________________________________________ devel mailing list devel@lists.open-mpi.org https://rfd.newmexicoconsortium.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
