Hey Artem, all, Thank you for the benchmark prototype. I have created the discussion page here : https://github.com/open-mpi/2016-summer-perf-testing/issues/1.
* There, I have single threaded and multithreaded performance posted. * The script I used is now in the repo (also in the discussion page) * Result with openib will come up probably next week. I have to access UTK machine for that. * I did some test and yes, I have seen some openib hang in multithreaded case. Thank you, Arm <https://github.com/open-mpi/2016-summer-perf-testing/issues/1> From: devel <devel-boun...@lists.open-mpi.org<mailto:devel-boun...@lists.open-mpi.org>> on behalf of Artem Polyakov <artpo...@gmail.com<mailto:artpo...@gmail.com>> Reply-To: Open MPI Developers <devel@lists.open-mpi.org<mailto:devel@lists.open-mpi.org>> Date: Thursday, July 28, 2016 at 10:42 PM To: Open MPI Developers <devel@lists.open-mpi.org<mailto:devel@lists.open-mpi.org>> Subject: Re: [OMPI devel] Performance analysis proposal Thank you, Arm! Good to have vader results (I haven't tried it myself yet). Few comments/questions: 1. I guess we also want to have 1-threaded performance for the "baseline" reference. 2. Have you tried to run with openib, as I mentioned on the call I had some problems with it and I'm curious if you can reproduce in your environment. Github issue sounds good for me! 2016-07-29 12:30 GMT+07:00 Arm Patinyasakdikul (apatinya) <apati...@cisco.com<mailto:apati...@cisco.com>>: I added some result to https://github.com/open-mpi/2016-summer-perf-testing The result shows much better performance from 2.0.0 and master over 1.10.3 for vader. The test ran with Artem’s version of benchmark on OB1, single node, bind to socket. We should have a place to discuss/comment/collaborate on results. Should I open an issue on that repo? So we can have github style commenting/referencing. Arm On 7/28/16, 3:02 PM, "devel on behalf of Jeff Squyres (jsquyres)" <devel-boun...@lists.open-mpi.org<mailto:devel-boun...@lists.open-mpi.org> on behalf of jsquy...@cisco.com<mailto:jsquy...@cisco.com>> wrote: >On Jul 28, 2016, at 6:28 AM, Artem Polyakov ><artpo...@gmail.com<mailto:artpo...@gmail.com>> wrote: >> >> Jeff and others, >> >> 1. The benchmark was updated to support shared memory case. >> 2. The wiki was updated with the benchmark description: >> https://github.com/open-mpi/ompi/wiki/Request-refactoring-test#benchmark-prototype > >Sweet -- thanks! > >> Let me know if we want to put this prototype to some general place. I think >> it makes sense. > >I just created: > > https://github.com/open-mpi/2016-summer-perf-testing > >Want to put it there? > >Arm just ran a bunch of tests today and will be committing a bunch of results >in there shortly. > >-- >Jeff Squyres >jsquy...@cisco.com<mailto:jsquy...@cisco.com> >For corporate legal information go to: >http://www.cisco.com/web/about/doing_business/legal/cri/ > >_______________________________________________ >devel mailing list >devel@lists.open-mpi.org<mailto:devel@lists.open-mpi.org> >https://rfd.newmexicoconsortium.org/mailman/listinfo/devel _______________________________________________ devel mailing list devel@lists.open-mpi.org<mailto:devel@lists.open-mpi.org> https://rfd.newmexicoconsortium.org/mailman/listinfo/devel -- С Уважением, Поляков Артем Юрьевич Best regards, Artem Y. Polyakov
_______________________________________________ devel mailing list devel@lists.open-mpi.org https://rfd.newmexicoconsortium.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
