Maybe he is -10!'ing, which is worst than -10'ing!

On Nov 23, 2011, at 7:52 PM, Jeff Squyres wrote:

> Can you explain that a little more?  Are you -10'ing the whole concept?  Or 
> just renaming xpmem?  Or ...?
> 
> On Nov 22, 2011, at 11:37 AM, George Bosilca wrote:
> 
>> -10!
>> 
>> george.
>> 
>> On Nov 22, 2011, at 08:38 , Jeff Squyres wrote:
>> 
>>> 1. Personally, I would love to rename the openib BTL to something that 
>>> makes sense and is a current name.  By "rename", I include "rename the 
>>> directory" -- so it would be ompi/mca/btl/ofrc, or something like that.
>>> 
>>> 2. Good point about error reporting.  I would think that the component 
>>> (e.g., ofrc/openib BTL) should report the name that was specified by the 
>>> user.  But this could be a PITA to implement -- you couldn't just hard-code 
>>> your component name in error messages anymore; there would have to be some 
>>> level of indirection, such as a global variable that the MCA base fills in 
>>> with the name that your component was referred to by.  
>>> 
>>> 
>>> On Nov 22, 2011, at 9:34 AM, TERRY DONTJE wrote:
>>> 
>>>> So with the aliasing scheme the code for openib would still under 
>>>> ompi/mca/btl/openib but you could access it with -mca btl ofrc?  Ok, so 
>>>> when an error happens in the openib btl how does it identify itself?  Does 
>>>> it use openib or ofrc?  This seems like there could be some user confusion 
>>>> by adopting the aliasing scheme.
>>>> 
>>>> --td
>>>> 
>>>> On 11/22/2011 9:22 AM, Jeff Squyres wrote:
>>>>> Here's what Nathan and I discussed / decided:
>>>>> 
>>>>> 1. Nathan shied away from the name "xpmem" in case some other shared 
>>>>> memory scheme basically did the same thing as XPMEM (i.e., single copy 
>>>>> techniques).  (just FYI: xpmem's setup is a little different from KNEM, 
>>>>> though, so they didn't merge in KNEM support to vader)  Hence, he wanted 
>>>>> a neutral name that could apply to xpmem and others.  He and Sam have 
>>>>> some possible names that could be suitable ("single copy 
>>>>> ...something..."; I don't remember offhand).
>>>>> 
>>>>> 2. We've long talked about having an MCA component aliasing scheme.  
>>>>> Perhaps now is the time to do it.  Such a scheme would do two things:
>>>>> 
>>>>> - provide alias names for components.  For example, both of the following
>>>>>   would be equivalent:
>>>>> 
>>>>>       mpirun --mca btl openib,self ...
>>>>>       mpirun --mca btl ofrc,self ...
>>>>> 
>>>>> - automatically register alias MCA parameters.  For example, both of the
>>>>>   following would be equivalent:
>>>>> 
>>>>>       mpirun --mca btl_openib_param 1 ...
>>>>>       mpirun --mca btl_ofrc_param 1 ...
>>>>> 
>>>>> This would solve two problems:
>>>>> 
>>>>> 2a. Finally be able to rename the "openib" module to something more 
>>>>> sensical; "ofrc", perhaps?  ("ofrc" = OpenFabrics reliable connected 
>>>>> transport, as opposed to the existing "ofud" = OpenFabrics unreliable 
>>>>> datagram transport BTL).
>>>>> 
>>>>> 2b. Rename vader to be xpmem, because it only supports xpmem at the 
>>>>> moment.  If that component is expanded in the future to support other 
>>>>> similar single-copy schemes, it can be renamed to some neutral name and 
>>>>> have "xpmem" as an alias.
>>>>> 
>>>>> Nathan agreed to look into a module aliasing scheme / vader->xpmem rename 
>>>>> after he works the hide-OB1/BTL-descriptor-lengths issue that was 
>>>>> previously discussed on the list.  This will likely be in early/mid 
>>>>> December.
>>>>> 
>>>>> 
>>>>> 
>>>>> On Nov 17, 2011, at 8:11 AM, Jeff Squyres wrote:
>>>>> 
>>>>> 
>>>>>> After having to explain to someone at SC for the umpteenth time this 
>>>>>> week that the "vader" BTL uses the XPMEM transport under the covers, I'd 
>>>>>> like to put forth an appeal to rename the "vader" BTL to be "xpmem."
>>>>>> 
>>>>>> Here's my rationale for why:
>>>>>> 
>>>>>> 1. Although we have a history of Star Wars-related names, the "ob1" and 
>>>>>> "r2" components got their names because they're mainly algorithms that 
>>>>>> have no obvious name that describes what they do.
>>>>>> 
>>>>>> 2. All other components that tie into some back-end system are named 
>>>>>> reflecting the back-end system (e.g., tcp, mx, portals, ...etc.).  
>>>>>> "openib" is the weakest example, but we all know that it was named way 
>>>>>> back when OFED was named "OpenIB", and the name has kinda stuck.
>>>>>> 
>>>>>> 3. The BTL name "xpmem" follows the law of least astonishment from the 
>>>>>> user's perspective.
>>>>>> 
>>>>>> 4. Cute names rarely seem so after 6 months.
>>>>>> 
>>>>>> I'll even volunteer to do the work to rename it (a bunch of file moves 
>>>>>> and global search-and-replaces).
>>>>>> 
>>>>>> -- 
>>>>>> Jeff Squyres
>>>>>> 
>>>>>> jsquy...@cisco.com
>>>>>> 
>>>>>> For corporate legal information go to:
>>>>>> 
>>>>>> http://www.cisco.com/web/about/doing_business/legal/cri/
>>>>>> 
>>>>>> 
>>>>>> 
>>>>>> _______________________________________________
>>>>>> devel mailing list
>>>>>> 
>>>>>> de...@open-mpi.org
>>>>>> http://www.open-mpi.org/mailman/listinfo.cgi/devel
>>>>> 
>>>> 
>>>> -- 
>>>> <Mail Attachment.gif>
>>>> Terry D. Dontje | Principal Software Engineer
>>>> Developer Tools Engineering | +1.781.442.2631
>>>> Oracle - Performance Technologies
>>>> 95 Network Drive, Burlington, MA 01803
>>>> Email terry.don...@oracle.com
>>>> 
>>>> 
>>>> 
>>>> _______________________________________________
>>>> devel mailing list
>>>> de...@open-mpi.org
>>>> http://www.open-mpi.org/mailman/listinfo.cgi/devel
>>> 
>>> 
>>> -- 
>>> Jeff Squyres
>>> jsquy...@cisco.com
>>> For corporate legal information go to:
>>> http://www.cisco.com/web/about/doing_business/legal/cri/
>>> 
>>> 
>>> _______________________________________________
>>> devel mailing list
>>> de...@open-mpi.org
>>> http://www.open-mpi.org/mailman/listinfo.cgi/devel
>> 
>> 
>> _______________________________________________
>> devel mailing list
>> de...@open-mpi.org
>> http://www.open-mpi.org/mailman/listinfo.cgi/devel
> 
> 
> -- 
> Jeff Squyres
> jsquy...@cisco.com
> For corporate legal information go to:
> http://www.cisco.com/web/about/doing_business/legal/cri/
> 
> 
> _______________________________________________
> devel mailing list
> de...@open-mpi.org
> http://www.open-mpi.org/mailman/listinfo.cgi/devel


Reply via email to