On Aug 29, 2016, at 11:32 AM, C Bergström <cbergst...@pathscale.com> wrote: > > Based on the latest response - it seems that we'll just fork OMPI and > maintain those patches on top. I'll advise our customers not to use > OMPI and document why.
Chris: you didn't answer several of the specific, directed questions on this thread. You can't expect us to expend significant engineering resources -- and give up the acknowledged benefits of C99 -- without a bit more specific information. -- Jeff Squyres jsquy...@cisco.com For corporate legal information go to: http://www.cisco.com/web/about/doing_business/legal/cri/ _______________________________________________ devel mailing list devel@lists.open-mpi.org https://rfd.newmexicoconsortium.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
