correction, the argument of `dont fix what aint broke` fell on deaf ears.
On Thu, Jun 23, 2011 at 9:27 AM, Joost Ruis <[email protected]> wrote:
> This is what I suggested to use as release sched, but staff didn't
> agree on it so we decided to use this versioning instead.
>
> On Thu, Jun 23, 2011 at 6:14 PM, Stuart Rose <[email protected]> wrote:
>> Why are we going to switch the versioning mechanism to another system that
>> tells users absolutely nothing about what the version number means?
>>
>> If Sabayon 6.x (or simply 6) isn't going to correlate with an entropy
>> branch, then the 6 doesn't tell the users anything.
>>
>> I understand if going all the way to 5.4189 doesn't sound appealing, but
>> couldn't we at least switch to a system that gives some information.
>>
>> While I am typically not one to say that Ubuntu does anything right, at
>> least their version mechanism immediately tells you when it was released.
>>
>> I don't know. Maybe I missed the point.
>>
>> -Stuart
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>
>
>
