Ian Bruene via devel <devel@ntpsec.org>: > I was already on the verge of calling it, given the above I am now > Officially Calling SNMP support as slipping past 1.0.
Strictly speaking you can't do that. It's the PM's decision whether we want to drop the feature or change the schedule. We're pretty informal here, but you need to know where those lines of authority are, because many other projects (especially in corporate-land) aren't. But, speaking in Mark's absence, I'm OK with slipping it. It's not like Classic had this right; their snmpd was broken by design (not RFC-conformant) and in fact its author urged me to remove it. I think our support can wait for 1.1. Possibly Mark might do an override on this, but I doubt it. -- <a href="http://www.catb.org/~esr/">Eric S. Raymond</a> Please consider contributing to my Patreon page at https://www.patreon.com/esr so I can keep the invisible wheels of the Internet turning. Give generously - the civilization you save might be your own. _______________________________________________ devel mailing list devel@ntpsec.org http://lists.ntpsec.org/mailman/listinfo/devel