Zou, Yi wrote:
>>>>> + * @sp: The sequence in the RLS exchange
>>>>> + * @fp: The RLS request frame
>>>>> + * @lport: The local port recieving the RLS
>>>>> + *
>>>>> + * Locking Note: The lport lock is expected to be held before calling
>>>>> + * this function.
>>>>> + *
>>>>> + * FIXME: how to check/indicate if we want support RLS for LESB?
>>>> If the LLD supports it?
>>> I don't know how the LLD will indicate to FCoE stack this is supported,
>>> possibly by netdev flags as well? I wanted call it out as I did not
>>> find any way to query if this feature is supported.
>> I think RLS is always supported, right? Make the LLDs all support it,
>> or indicate support with lport->tt.ldd_stats != NULL.
> I guess so, the spec says to reject if RLS is not supported, which is why
> I was wondering under what condition to not support it.
We can just always support it going forward. The only condition not
to support it would be the way it was before you wrote this code! :-)
We reject all the ops that we don't support.
Cheers,
Joe
_______________________________________________
devel mailing list
[email protected]
http://www.open-fcoe.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
