Hi Baptiste, Thanks for the clarification.
Have you already been in contact personally with Thiago? It may be interesting if they attend and/or present something on this topic at the upcoming RIOT Summit [1]. Cheers, Emmanuel [1] summit.riot-os.org On May 30, 2016 4:19 PM, "Baptiste Clenet" <[email protected]> wrote: > Hi, I correct what I said, Soletta Project is not an implementation of > Iotivity but an implementation of OIC specification (Iotivity too) so > Iotivity and Soletta project can communicate together since they use same > specification. > > Intel Open Source is in charge of this project and you can ask > [email protected] for more information. > > Cheers, > > 2016-05-30 10:41 GMT+02:00 Oleg Hahm <[email protected]>: > >> Hi! >> >> On Mon, May 30, 2016 at 09:16:17AM +0200, Baptiste Clenet wrote: >> > - Iotivity would be great in RIOT, Soletta project [1] imported it for >> > RIOT, I haven't tried it but it seems to work. I think Riot should have >> an >> > implementation of Iotivity directly in its repo (package) so it will be >> > better maintain. >> >> Very interesting and good to know. I was not aware of this project (and I >> think most of the RIOT maintainers weren't either). And yes, for >> maintainability a package in RIOT might make sense. We just need a >> maintainer >> willing to do so. ;-) >> >> Baptiste, do you know the people behind Soletta? >> >> Cheers, >> Oleg >> >> -- >> printk("Entering UltraSMPenguin Mode...\n"); >> linux-2.2.16/arch/sparc64/kernel/smp.c >> >> _______________________________________________ >> devel mailing list >> [email protected] >> https://lists.riot-os.org/mailman/listinfo/devel >> >> > > > -- > Baptiste > > _______________________________________________ > devel mailing list > [email protected] > https://lists.riot-os.org/mailman/listinfo/devel > >
_______________________________________________ devel mailing list [email protected] https://lists.riot-os.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
