Thanks for your answers. Could we integrate Soletta OIC implementation part as a pkg in RIOT?
2016-06-07 12:58 GMT+02:00 Emmanuel Baccelli <emmanuel.bacce...@inria.fr>: > Hi Gustavo, Hi Ivan, > ok I see. thanks for your answers. > That's too bad. It would have been great to gather OIC/OCF people in the > same room with W3C, IETF and OpenThread people (who are attending the RIOT > Summit) to discuss various IoT network stack approaches, and various IoT > open source software approaches. Pitching Intel's approach to IoT in this > context would also have been a good occasion, in the opinion of many among > us. > If there's anything we can do to help you or someone else from your > community attend/present, let us know. > Else, maybe next time. > Cheers, > Emmanuel > > On Mon, Jun 6, 2016 at 11:26 PM, Gustavo Lima Chaves < > gustavo.lima.cha...@intel.com> wrote: > >> Hi, >> >> > Sorry, I was under the assumption that this had been settled in private >> > conversations already, but now I see that's not the case (and the person >> > involved is not even copied). >> > >> > Soletta has an implementation of OIC, the protocol that IoTivity >> > implements, but there's nothing about AllJoyn or Thread. >> > >> > I'm in no position to talk about anything now, so I have to decline the >> > invitation, but maybe some of the others listed that have been more >> > involved with Soletta and OIC can respond. >> > >> > On Mon, 06 Jun 2016 22:40:34 +0200, Baptiste Clenet wrote: >> > > Could some of you answer please? >> > > Thanks >> > > >> > > Baptiste >> > > >> > > 2016-05-31 17:30 GMT+02:00 Thiago Macieira <thiago.macie...@intel.com >> >: >> > > >> > > > Hello Baptiste, Emmanuel >> > > > >> > > > I'll let the people more familiar (in cc) with it reply. >> > > > >> > > > On terça-feira, 31 de maio de 2016 16:05:22 BRT Emmanuel Baccelli >> wrote: >> > > > > Hi Thiago, >> > > > > basically, we are interested in learning more about it. >> > > > > And in particular, we were wondering whether it could be a good >> idea to >> > > > > present this at the RIOT Summit [1]. >> > > > > What do you think about this idea? >> > > > > Best, >> > > > > Emmanuel >> >> Oh, sorry, I was also in the private thread (was going to respond >> soon, but now let's do it here). I have to say that I'm not very >> comfortable to do a skype-based presentation. Given that the changes >> of getting funds to travel to the summit are vague now, maybe I'll >> have to decline as well, unfortunately. >> >> [...] >> >> > > > > >>>> Hi! >> > > > > >>>> >> > > > > >>>> On Mon, May 30, 2016 at 09:16:17AM +0200, Baptiste Clenet >> wrote: >> > > > > >>>> > - Iotivity would be great in RIOT, Soletta project [1] >> imported it >> > > > > >>>> > for >> > > > > >>>> > RIOT, I haven't tried it but it seems to work. I think >> Riot should >> > > > > >>>> >> > > > > >>>> have an >> > > > > >>>> >> > > > > >>>> > implementation of Iotivity directly in its repo (package) >> so it >> > > > will >> > > > > >>>> >> > > > > >>>> be >> > > > > >>>> >> > > > > >>>> > better maintain. >> >> If all of OIC/OCF is to be supported, that's quite a bit of code and >> using Soletta is a much simpler path. >> >> -- >> Gustavo Lima Chaves >> Intel - Open Source Technology Center >> > > -- Baptiste
_______________________________________________ devel mailing list devel@riot-os.org https://lists.riot-os.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
