On 13/12/2018 20:30, Sebastian Huber wrote: > On 13/12/2018 09:16, Jiri Gaisler wrote: >>> I use the SIS every day for RTEMS development and test suite runs. The >>> SMP support would be a very valuable for RTEMS development. If we can >>> get also code coverage from it, then it would be perfect. >> I can look at the coverage support.
This would be fantastic. The support for detailed analysis of trace data in RTEMS is growing. Covoar has had a lot of work done on it this year. An efficient cross-host way to get good trace data will improve the quality of RTEMS. I, like Sebastian, use the SIS for my development work. >> Is there a standardized format for coverage data that I should use? > > I am not sure if there exists a standardized format. but Joel is the expert in > this area. The covoar tool currently support the couverture qemu trace format. I am not sure if it is something Adacore invented. The covoar tool is run from within the rtems-test tool when the BSP supports coverage. It has the ability to support a number of formats so we can add what is created. I suggest any format that is compact and can be parsed in a single pass should be fine. The ability to control the trace file name would be nice. The rtems-test tool runs the sis simulator in parallel on the available cores and we now have a number of executables in the same directory. Chris _______________________________________________ devel mailing list devel@rtems.org http://lists.rtems.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
