On 14/12/18 8:48 pm, Jiri Gaisler wrote: > OK, I will look into this over Christmas. I have some long flights > coming up so it will be a good way to kill time ... :-)
Great. I have been on a few flights recently and I have been doing the same thing. Power in the seats is nice and WiFi is even better. > Failures: > dl07.exe That should not be happening. I will check this as part of some work I am planning. > Invalid: > spinternalerror01.exe > sptimecounter01.exe These are typically crashes. > Average test time: 0:00:00.498379 > Testing time : 0:05:20.956184 That is a nice run time. If you add the --mail and related options (--mail-to, --mail-from, --smtp-host) the results can be posted to bu...@rtems.org. We love seeing results being posted by any and everyone. > The four failing/invalid tests fail the same way on real hardware, so I > am not too worried about this. Is the failure seen without rtems-test? I ask because I think there maybe a bug in rtems-test with a threading load when running a number of simulations at once. I am not sure if this is a qemu specific issue or a general one, I need to revisit it. I suspect a locking issue in rtems-test and it can be seen with tests hanging and simulators showing 0 load in top. On a non-smp build, I get the same fails, > so it seems to be some issue with the tests... There is a ticket open on 5.1 to have tests that do fail to be tagged as "Expected Fail" so we can baseline what is expected. I cannot do this alone because I am not sure which ones are expected failures. Chris _______________________________________________ devel mailing list devel@rtems.org http://lists.rtems.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
