+CC Thomas for buildroot aspect On 11/29/2016 09:31 PM, Waldemar Brodkorb wrote: > Hi, > > I am preparing a release and would like to remove UCLIBC_HAS_LFS > before doing it. > > I believe UCLIBC_HAS_LFS does make the code more complex and > the benefit to disable it to save some bytes is not high enough. > > Most users have UCLIBC_HAS_LFS enabled and it is enabled by default. > > Attached is a patch. > > Any comments? > > best regards > Waldemar
I welcome this change - is there going to be impact on downstream projects like busybox. What if it some disables CONFIG_LFS inside busybox ? -Vineet _______________________________________________ devel mailing list devel@uclibc-ng.org http://mailman.uclibc-ng.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/devel