Hi Vineet,
Vineet Gupta wrote,

> +CC Thomas for buildroot aspect
> 
> On 11/29/2016 09:31 PM, Waldemar Brodkorb wrote:
> > Hi,
> >
> > I am preparing a release and would like to remove UCLIBC_HAS_LFS
> > before doing it.
> >
> > I believe UCLIBC_HAS_LFS does make the code more complex and
> > the benefit to disable it to save some bytes is not high enough.
> >
> > Most users have UCLIBC_HAS_LFS enabled and it is enabled by default.
> >
> > Attached is a patch.
> >
> > Any comments?
> >
> > best regards
> >  Waldemar
> 
> I welcome this change - is there going to be impact on downstream projects 
> like
> busybox. What if it some disables CONFIG_LFS inside busybox ?

At least it does compile fine and I can bootup a system in Qemu.
I think it will just not work with files bigger than 2GB.

Busybox use LFS mostly for Android systems, if I interpret the code
in libbb.h correctly.

best regards
 Waldemar
_______________________________________________
devel mailing list
devel@uclibc-ng.org
http://mailman.uclibc-ng.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/devel

Reply via email to