Vineet Gupta wrote,
> +CC Thomas for buildroot aspect
> On 11/29/2016 09:31 PM, Waldemar Brodkorb wrote:
> > Hi,
> > I am preparing a release and would like to remove UCLIBC_HAS_LFS
> > before doing it.
> > I believe UCLIBC_HAS_LFS does make the code more complex and
> > the benefit to disable it to save some bytes is not high enough.
> > Most users have UCLIBC_HAS_LFS enabled and it is enabled by default.
> > Attached is a patch.
> > Any comments?
> > best regards
> > Waldemar
> I welcome this change - is there going to be impact on downstream projects
> busybox. What if it some disables CONFIG_LFS inside busybox ?
At least it does compile fine and I can bootup a system in Qemu.
I think it will just not work with files bigger than 2GB.
Busybox use LFS mostly for Android systems, if I interpret the code
in libbb.h correctly.
devel mailing list