Hi Vineet, Vineet Gupta wrote, > +CC Thomas for buildroot aspect > > On 11/29/2016 09:31 PM, Waldemar Brodkorb wrote: > > Hi, > > > > I am preparing a release and would like to remove UCLIBC_HAS_LFS > > before doing it. > > > > I believe UCLIBC_HAS_LFS does make the code more complex and > > the benefit to disable it to save some bytes is not high enough. > > > > Most users have UCLIBC_HAS_LFS enabled and it is enabled by default. > > > > Attached is a patch. > > > > Any comments? > > > > best regards > > Waldemar > > I welcome this change - is there going to be impact on downstream projects > like > busybox. What if it some disables CONFIG_LFS inside busybox ?
At least it does compile fine and I can bootup a system in Qemu. I think it will just not work with files bigger than 2GB. Busybox use LFS mostly for Android systems, if I interpret the code in libbb.h correctly. best regards Waldemar _______________________________________________ devel mailing list [email protected] http://mailman.uclibc-ng.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/devel
