>>>>> "Ivan" == Ivan Pascal <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>> What I cannot find is *where* those fake scancodes are generated >> and how they are mapped to 0x81-0x84.... Ivan> xc/programs/Xserver/hw/xfree86/common/xf86Events.c Ivan> xf86PostKbdEvent() subroutine Ok. From that it looks like I need e0/01 thru e0/04, but as far as I can tell, X does not see real raw codes from linux, but must reverse engineer them. There is no general pattern from actual raw codes received by linux, the value linux covnerts the raw code to, and X's keycode. Eg, the 3 inet keys that still work are: Key Raw atk X11 ----- ----- --- --- VolUp e0/32 115 176 VolDn e0/21 114 174 Mute e0/23 113 160 If xf86PostKbdEvent() is adding 0x78 to the 2nd octet of a e0/xx sequence and keycode=scanCode + MIN_KEYCODE (aka 8), that means 0x80 is getting added to the 2nd octet to make the keycode, so X is seeing a scanCode of e0/48, e0/46 & e0/32 for those three. So where does 113,114,115 turn into e0/32, e0/46, e0/48 ? And what would turn into e0/01 thru e0/04 ? Apologies for being confused by this code. >> How do I get both us(pc105) and inet(inspiron)? Ivan> Simply use the second way. If the model name is the same as one Ivan> of inet file sections name, XKB uses us(pc105) map and _adds_ Ivan> inet(model_name) to it. (I mean XFree86 4.3.0. In previous Ivan> versions it uses us(pc104). ) Cool. Good to know. -JimC _______________________________________________ Devel mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://XFree86.Org/mailman/listinfo/devel
