David Dawes <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > going back to 3.3. Unless someone comes up with a better solution, > that's what I'm planning to do.
OK, it seems to be the best solution in this situation. I dare to propose another solution, however: to delete the `geometry' directory and created a new one (named `geometry2` or `geom` or whatever) which will have companies as lowercased directories. > Is there a reason why the extra geometry descriptions couldn't be added > to the original 'hp' file instead of putting them in separate files in > a subdirectory? XKB should allow multiple descriptions per file. Yes, that's right. This is not a limitaton of XKB. If you have a look into newly created geometry, you'll see that it already contains 3 sections, which are nested and re-used: 1. for the mouse stick 2. for the base frame and common buttons 3. for US keyboard layout. Some other geometries (like ibm/thinkpad) have also 4. for national layouts. I believe that this is a correct way to develop geometries for related keyboards and I think that it is logical to combine them into one file. Knowing all the problems now, I would still prefer this solution. I have already developed 4 geometry specifications and will continue to do so. I don't want to create problems, though :-) I'm open to suggestions. Thanks! -- Alexander Pohoyda <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> _______________________________________________ Devel mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://XFree86.Org/mailman/listinfo/devel