Harold L Hunt II wrote (in a message from Friday 19)
> Matthieu,
>
> The new file, prngc.c, uses sockaddr_storage. However, I know that at
> least Cygwin does not have sockaddr_storage.
>
> No alternative is provided and no conditional compilation is in effect
> to fall back to previous functionality when sockaddr_storage is not
> available. This breaks the build on Cygwin.
>
> What can be done to fix the build on platforms that do not have
> sockaddr_storage?
>
> I already tried using sockaddr instead, but that is missing fields that
> are contained in sockaddr_storage. Any other ideas?
Does cygwin have AF_UNIX sockets and the sys/un.h header ? If so it's
quite easy to adapt the code not to use sockaddr_storage.
Otherwise, I'll provide a way to #ifdef out the prngd code, but then
if /dev/[u]random fails, xdm will have to abort (or run with
predictibles cookies).
Matthieu
_______________________________________________
Devel mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://XFree86.Org/mailman/listinfo/devel