On Fri, 5 Dec 2003 00:16:11 +0100, Alexander Stohr <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>diff does not work on binary files, you better compare the file sizes. >i dont have to doubt, ldd must resolve the active files all the time. I compared the sizes as well. I must look. I have somewhere written a CRC32 tool to compare files. >the 2nd is a reasonable effect. >the first case should have some 2.000 fps or more, >i think its software. Yes. People said they got about 2500 FPS with this card. >try re-running glxgears with settings LIBGL_VERBOSE=1 >and LIBGL_DEBUG=1 in the hosting shell, somtimes that >gives some more hint. libGL error: XF86DRIQueryDirectRenderingCapable returned false libGL error: XF86DRIQueryDirectRenderingCapable returned false 1289 frames in 5.0 seconds = 257.800 FPS 1500 frames in 5.0 seconds = 300.000 FPS >depends on distor and setup, sometimes there are standalone >Mesa packages and other times it is all merged into the XF86 >libGL packages as the non-optional sofware renderer fallback. At your suggestion I found one liGL.so.1 which was still linked to the xf86 lib, but changing that also didn't help. You think it would be worth to reinstall KDE? I would like to debug the startup from KDE, but I haven't much experience with X/KDE stuff. -- Gerhard Gruber Maintainer of SoftICE for Linux - http://sourceforge.net/projects/pice Fast application launcher - http://sourceforge.net/projects/launchmenu _______________________________________________ Devel mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://XFree86.Org/mailman/listinfo/devel
