On Mon, 19 Jan 2004, David Dawes wrote: > On Mon, Jan 19, 2004 at 10:11:53PM +0100, Nicolas Joly wrote: > > > >Just a small summary with 16 tests failues : > > > >Tests for XDrawArc > >Test 42: FAIL > >Test 63: FAIL > >Test 66: FAIL > >Test 73: FAIL > >Tests for XDrawArcs > >Test 45: FAIL > >Test 66: FAIL > >Test 69: FAIL > >Test 76: FAIL > > The arc failures here look like the expected ones.
Yes, those are waived. > > >Tests for XDrawLine > >Test 52: FAIL > >Tests for XDrawLines > >Test 57: FAIL > >Tests for XDrawSegments > >Test 53: FAIL > > Those three are real. Does the Savage hardware really have a Bresenham line interface? If so, why is it providing the TwoPointLine interface? If your lines are correct, you should be able to run: http://www.xfree86.org/~mvojkovi/linetest.c without artifacts. > > >Tests for XChangeKeyboardControl > >Test 9: FAIL > >Test 10: FAIL > > That has been showing up for a while. It should be followed up. That's been showing up for a couple years. It's a regression. > > >Tests for XKillClient > >Test 2: FAIL > > I see the occasional XKillClient fail, but haven't been able to reproduce > it reliably. I'm not sure if it is a real bug, or a flaw in the test. I've never seen that one. > > >Tests for XRebindKeysym > >Test 1: FAIL > > The XRebindKeysym failure goes away if XKB is disabled. Yes, it's a XKB problem/feature. > > >Tests for ChangeHosts > >Test 1: FAIL > > Maybe you didn't set the hostname correctly for the test? Looks like a test configuration error. Mark. _______________________________________________ Devel mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://XFree86.Org/mailman/listinfo/devel
