On Mon, Jan 26, 2004 at 09:58:53AM -0800, Kendall Bennett wrote: >David Dawes <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > >> >Finally have you considered building Cygwin/X with the new SFU 3.5 tools >> >fom Microsoft? It includes native ports of GCC to Windows, which may be >> >better than Cygwin performance wise. I don't know however if the SFU SDK >> >will allow you access to Windows services or only Unix ones. >> >> Sounds like a great idea. A native Windows build/port would be ideal, >> IMHO. > >I am working on getting both a native Windows port and OS/2 working >properly again. I would much prefer *not* to have to use my own source >tree and constantly patch in changes from thd XFree86 tree (or the X.org >tree or whatever). > >Since it sounds like you think this is a good idea, can I get CVS commit >access to complete this work?
Even though I have XFree86 CVS commit access, I do most of my new work in a separate tree, which I keep in sync with the XFree86 tree. I don't find this to be a significant burden. David -- David Dawes developer/release engineer The XFree86 Project www.XFree86.org/~dawes _______________________________________________ Devel mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://XFree86.Org/mailman/listinfo/devel
