On Mon, Mar 01, 2004 at 04:19:21PM -0800, Mark Vojkovich wrote: > The current XAA has functions starting with "XAA" and header files > starting with "xaa". To avoid namespace pollution, the second > implementation of XAA will need a different namespace. It seems > good to avoid calling it anything with a '2' in the name. I'm > leaning towards "Xaa" for the functions and header files. Any > concerns?
So, based on the case problem... I'd go with Xaa_Line.c instead of the current xaaLine.c and you can still use Xaa....() for the functions. Alan. _______________________________________________ Devel mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://XFree86.Org/mailman/listinfo/devel
