On Tue, 2 Mar 2004, [ISO-8859-1] Frank Gießler wrote:
> Mark Vojkovich wrote:
> > We don't care what the filenames are except for the header files.
> > The only reason why we care about header files is that a driver
> > might include support for both and may need both include paths.
> > There's only one exported header file. I'd like to name it Xaa.h
> > to match the namespace. Is it really going to be relevant on
> > case-unaware systems? Which ones are those BTW?
>
> There is already xaa.h. Having Xaa.h included at the same time is a
> no-op for OS/2, for which there are already binaries for 4.4.0 available
> (I would therefore consider this a well supported platform).
>
Well, then I guess I could call the header file xaa2.h
Mark.
_______________________________________________
Devel mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://XFree86.Org/mailman/listinfo/devel
