On Tue, 2004-03-02 at 21:06, Mark Vojkovich wrote:
> On Tue, 2 Mar 2004, David Dawes wrote:
> 
> > On Tue, Mar 02, 2004 at 10:57:04AM -0800, Mark Vojkovich wrote:
> > >
> > >   Well, then I guess I could call the header file xaa2.h
> > 
> > Not to be too picky, but won't this be the third version of XAA, not the
> > second?
> 
>    Yes, it's actually the third.  Harm's was the first.  I think we
> even advertised XFree86 4.x's XAA as 2.0.  Would you prefer xaa3.h ?

As everyone knows, counting starts at 0, so xaa2 in fact denotes the
third XAA. :)


-- 
Earthling Michel DÃnzer      |     Debian (powerpc), X and DRI developer
Libre software enthusiast    |   http://svcs.affero.net/rm.php?r=daenzer

_______________________________________________
Devel mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://XFree86.Org/mailman/listinfo/devel

Reply via email to