Toomas Soome <[email protected]> wrote: > >> +typedef uint8_t u_int8_t; /* unsigned integrals > >> (deprecated) */ > >> +typedef uint16_t u_int16_t; > >> +typedef uint32_t u_int32_t; > >> +typedef uint64_t u_int64_t; > > > > This may make portable applications to fail. > > > > how so? if they are portable, they are not using u_* types, if you are not > using something, how it can make you to fail?
I don't know what happens exactly, but I remember that I has problems with something like that on Linux before - not sure whether the problem still exists. Jörg -- EMail:[email protected] (home) Jörg Schilling D-13353 Berlin [email protected] (work) Blog: http://schily.blogspot.com/ URL: http://cdrecord.org/private/ http://sf.net/projects/schilytools/files/' ------------------------------------------ openzfs-developer Archives: https://openzfs.topicbox.com/groups/developer/discussions/T0cc9a914d001ea54-Ma96e009f6f28468bd5591f4a Powered by Topicbox: https://topicbox.com
