prakashsurya commented on this pull request.
> @@ -282,10 +283,11 @@ boolean_t arc_watch = B_FALSE; int arc_procfd; #endif -static kmutex_t arc_reclaim_lock; -static kcondvar_t arc_reclaim_thread_cv; -static boolean_t arc_reclaim_thread_exit; -static kcondvar_t arc_reclaim_waiters_cv; +static zthr_t *arc_reap_zthr; +static zthr_t *arc_adjust_zthr; +static kmutex_t arc_adjust_lock; This is due to viewing the code/tabs in a browser; the code is actually correct: ``` static zthr_t *arc_reap_zthr; static zthr_t *arc_adjust_zthr; static kmutex_t arc_adjust_lock; static kcondvar_t arc_adjust_waiters_cv; static boolean_t arc_adjust_needed = B_FALSE; ``` -- You are receiving this because you are subscribed to this thread. Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub: https://github.com/openzfs/openzfs/pull/486#discussion_r148343077 ------------------------------------------ openzfs-developer Archives: https://openzfs.topicbox.com/groups/developer/discussions/Tf18bbbd46b0af4a7-Mcddfd6a80c7317a18213ede8 Powered by Topicbox: https://topicbox.com
