On Wed, Oct 23, 2019 at 06:10:53PM +0200, Udo Grabowski (IMK) wrote: > > That's exactly what I wanted to propose as an alternative, based > on what I've learned from this interesting discussion (which is really > civil and constuctive, compared to the flamewars other groups had with > their CoCs...). This formulation directly targets the bad behaviour > that should be sanctioned, instead of using an already contaminated term.
Yes, some terms, race for example, have different meanings in different locations. Others, sanction for example, are ambiguous. In either case, it's best to define your terms if there is doubt about them. -- -Gary Mills- -refurb- -Winnipeg, Manitoba, Canada- ------------------------------------------ openzfs: openzfs-developer Permalink: https://openzfs.topicbox.com/groups/developer/T91ab128e3e20cf25-M0323851c8152c6520bcecdfc Delivery options: https://openzfs.topicbox.com/groups/developer/subscription
