> I have 2 concerns with -ff:
> 1. I think the right flag would be -F, which is more in keeping with the
> existing CLI (e.g. see zpool import -f / -F, and zfs receive -F)
> 2. I'm not a big fan of making zpool overwrite unknown data. Even zpool create
> / zpool add will give a specific warning if it detects another filesystem type
> (e.g. UFS) present on the device, and it will refuse to add the device if it's
> currently mounted.  Can we make zpool labelclear -F at least that
> conservative?

My +1 for both
-Igor

> # newfs /dev/dsk/c1t1d0s0
> # zpool create test c1t1d0s0
> invalid vdev specification
> use '-f' to override the following errors:
> /dev/dsk/c1t1d0s0 contains a ufs filesystem.
> # zpool create test c1t1d0
> invalid vdev specification
> use '-f' to override the following errors:
> /dev/dsk/c1t1d0s0 contains a ufs filesystem.
> # mount /dev/dsk/c1t1d0s0 /mnt
> # zpool create -f test c1t1d0
> invalid vdev specification
> the following errors must be manually repaired:
> /dev/dsk/c1t1d0s0 is currently mounted on /mnt. Please see umount(1M).
> # zpool create -f test c1t1d0
> <success>
> ‹
> You are receiving this because you are subscribed to this thread.
> Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub
> <https://github.com/openzfs/openzfs/pull/83#issuecomment-205021076>
> 
>  openzfs-developer | Archives
> <https://www.listbox.com/member/archive/274414/=now>
> <https://www.listbox.com/member/archive/rss/274414/28059325-76ffcbac>  |
> Modify 
> <https://www.listbox.com/member/?&;
> 3>  Your Subscription <http://www.listbox.com>





-------------------------------------------
openzfs-developer
Archives: https://www.listbox.com/member/archive/274414/=now
RSS Feed: https://www.listbox.com/member/archive/rss/274414/28015062-cce53afa
Modify Your Subscription: 
https://www.listbox.com/member/?member_id=28015062&id_secret=28015062-f966d51c
Powered by Listbox: http://www.listbox.com

Reply via email to