> > I agree, and "zpool labelclear" is going to clear the label. > > "zpool labelclear" is not going to overwrite something that isn't a zpool > label, in part because I haven't heard any use case for it.
Wonderful, and the situation where there is just enough of a ZFS label that "zpool add" and "zpool attach" refuses to work, because there is a pool there; but not enough of a ZFS label for labelclear to work? This situation is frustrating. Now the labelclear conversation is somewhat nit-picking, what is far more important to us is https://www.illumos.org/issues/6477 This problem has already blown away users' existing ZFS pools, AND a user's unrelated HFS filesystem. It worries me :) At the moment we are considering removing "cache" support on O3X until we can find a solution. Lund -- Jorgen Lundman | <lund...@lundman.net> Unix Administrator | +81 (0)90-5578-8500 (work) Shibuya-ku, Tokyo | +81 (0)80-2090-5800 (cell) Japan | +81 (0)3 -3375-1767 (home) ------------------------------------------- openzfs-developer Archives: https://www.listbox.com/member/archive/274414/=now RSS Feed: https://www.listbox.com/member/archive/rss/274414/28015062-cce53afa Modify Your Subscription: https://www.listbox.com/member/?member_id=28015062&id_secret=28015062-f966d51c Powered by Listbox: http://www.listbox.com
