On Wed, Jun 17, 2009 at 1:35 PM, Tom Steinberg<[email protected]> wrote:
>> but I think it'll make things very very confusing to mix local and
>> parlimentary data on the same site.
>
> I'm afraid you may have been outvoted on this one, Stef, it's actually
> on the priorities list for this year:
>
> "Build TWFY for the five biggest councils in the UK" - 5 votes

That seems a bit ambiguous - does it mean "build a TWFY-like site" or
"add to TWFY"?

> Admittedly, it's still behind the redesign (in progress), adding video
> clips to MP pages, a page per bill containing related debates, and
> Future Business, but it is up there.
>
> What makes it interesting from my perspective is that unlike so much
> work on TWFY that needs the core team to do the whole thing (because
> TWFY is so complicated) it sounds like there might well be some good
> scope to work with volunteers who are clearly already working in this
> field.
>
> best,
>
> Tom
>
> _______________________________________________
> Mailing list [email protected]
> Archive, settings, or unsubscribe:
> https://secure.mysociety.org/admin/lists/mailman/listinfo/developers-public
>



-- 
Etienne Pollard
[email protected]
+44 (0) 7946 415 996

_______________________________________________
Mailing list [email protected]
Archive, settings, or unsubscribe:
https://secure.mysociety.org/admin/lists/mailman/listinfo/developers-public

Reply via email to