On Monday 06 July 2009 15:08:23 Stefan Magdalinski wrote: > I think we need to do some serious damage limitation. This is a very > *serious* misinformed accusation about us. > > worst bit is 'government-funded'
It looks a lot like a deliberate, targeted exercise in shutting people up whilst also spreading FUD about our motives. We should get the pledgebank to fund the site after funding is pulled going now. > > 2009/7/6 paul perrin <[email protected]>: > >> Interesting story - a few questions > >> "- the government-funded website" > >> > >> Where did she leave a 'comment' on the site? > >> How was the email traced? > >> Paul /)/+) > >> I would guess that - if the story is not actually invented out of whole cloth, which has to be a live consideration - they picked up a confirmation e-mail coming *in*. Presumably they filter incoming e-mail for spam, like everyone else in the world; sensitive topics, porno, foul language, and political unreliability are just more Bayesian filters to apply to the mail spool.
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part.
_______________________________________________ Mailing list [email protected] Archive, settings, or unsubscribe: https://secure.mysociety.org/admin/lists/mailman/listinfo/developers-public
