Alexander Harrowell wrote: > It looks a lot like a deliberate, targeted exercise in shutting people > up whilst also spreading FUD about our motives. We should get the > pledgebank to fund the site after funding is pulled going now.
TheyWorkForYou doesn't get any government funding currently (we got a small grant for adding historic data, but solely for that). The pledge already exists, if you're referring to http://pledgebank.com/twfypatrons > I would guess that - if the story is not actually invented out of whole > cloth, which has to be a live consideration - they picked up a > confirmation e-mail coming *in*. Hmm, I guess there are chinks in my armour even when I try to be totally clear. You can't comment on TheyWorkForYou without registering, so comments are either visible or reactively hidden if they're drawn to our attention. No comment equal to, or like in any way I tried, the one quoted by the Telegraph exists in the site's database in any form that I can find. Just to be clear :) ATB, Matthew _______________________________________________ Mailing list [email protected] Archive, settings, or unsubscribe: https://secure.mysociety.org/admin/lists/mailman/listinfo/developers-public
