On Wed, Jan 05, 2011 at 07:46:03AM +0200, Stefan Magdalinski wrote: > > OK. Not the strongest arguments in the world. But there's no *good* > > reason for information to be given solely to bailii anyway (there are > > numerous specious ones). > > > > Maybe I notice this more because I'm a lawyer and I often find myself > > searching bailii and having to use their appalling search engine. > > > > But exactly the same thing is true of (say) theyworkforyou. After all > > you can read Hansard on the web. "All" it does is present it a bit > > better 8-). > > > > Which makes it sound like a job for the kind of non-organisation that we used > to be.
Anyone would think you could set up *new non organisations* even when you had organisations as well! Like I say, anyone interested, mail me :) Francis _______________________________________________ Mailing list [email protected] Archive, settings, or unsubscribe: https://secure.mysociety.org/admin/lists/mailman/listinfo/developers-public
