It is the council giving 10 days notice (to the police) not getting 10 days
notice (from the applicant).

Effectively this means that they are committing to processing and
publishing the application on the day that they receive it, to ensure that
the minimum notice period of 10 days is met.

On Tue, Feb 7, 2012 at 12:37 PM, paul perrin <[email protected]> wrote:

> Not a lawyer - just assertive.. I'd argue...
>
> If it was there for them to handle first thing on the first day (which it
> would have been), then I'd argue that they have had 10 days notice.
>
> Its not your problem how the treat/handle/process things once they have
> been received by them - it was in their possession for 10 full working days.
>
> I read it that the 'clock' starts when the document is deposited at the
> correct address - not once it has been  forwarded/opened/read/stamped etc.
>
> If their post room was slow or on strike etc, that would be there look out
> - you wouldn't let them leave things unopened to stop the clock starting...
>
> It was with them for 10 working days end of...
>
> Paul /)/+)
> On 7 February 2012 12:19, Colm Howard-Lloyd <[email protected]> wrote:
>
>> For the removal of ambiguity the police are the only people who can
>> object to a Temporary Event Notice.  The 10 day period is for them to do so.
>>
>>
>> On Tue, Feb 7, 2012 at 12:16 PM, Colm Howard-Lloyd 
>> <[email protected]>wrote:
>>
>>> The Licensing Act is pretty clear on this.  The Act requires at least
>>> ten clear working days notice to the licensing authority when submitting a
>>> Temporary Event Notice.  10 clear working days excludes the day the notice
>>> is received and the day of the event.
>>>
>>> So therefore an application submitted on Sunday would be processed on a
>>> Monday and the 10 days would begin on the Tuesday.
>>>
>>> A pain, but quite reasonable as the 10 day waiting period is to give
>>> anyone who may be affected by the licence an opportunity to make
>>> representations - the consultation period is after application and not
>>> before.
>>>
>>>
>>> On Tue, Feb 7, 2012 at 11:48 AM, 'Dragon' Dave McKee <
>>> [email protected]> wrote:
>>>
>>>> Me and my friends are currently mildly miffed with the local council
>>>> about the meaning of "working days" (with specific regards to alcohol
>>>> licencing): if an application is submitted during the weekend for an
>>>> event a fortnight later, and there's no bank holidays in between, has
>>>> it been submitted ten working days in advance?
>>>>
>>>> The council says no; the application is deemed to have been submitted
>>>> on the Monday and hence there aren't ten clear working days.
>>>> We obviously want the answer to be yes, and have some circumstantial
>>>> evidence in the form of
>>>>
>>>> http://moderngov.cheshireeast.gov.uk/ecminutes/Published/C00000242/M00002542/AI00007234/$07ClearWorkingDaysreport.docA.ps.pdf
>>>> [not the council in question]
>>>>
>>>> I've got a funny feeling this has come up before in reference to
>>>> WhatDoTheyKnow and perhaps other sites, hence why I'm asking here: can
>>>> anyone shine any light on this?
>>>>
>>>> All responses will be assumed to have "I am not a lawyer, but..."
>>>> prepended. :P
>>>>
>>>> Dave.
>>>>
>>>> PS: The simple solution is to put the application in earlier. Didn't
>>>> happen last year, didn't happen this year, probably won't happen next
>>>> year... :P
>>>>
>>>> _______________________________________________
>>>> developers-public mailing list
>>>> [email protected]
>>>>
>>>> https://secure.mysociety.org/admin/lists/mailman/listinfo/developers-public
>>>>
>>>> Unsubscribe:
>>>> https://secure.mysociety.org/admin/lists/mailman/options/developers-public/colm%40truthmonkey.org
>>>>
>>>
>>>
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> developers-public mailing list
>> [email protected]
>>
>> https://secure.mysociety.org/admin/lists/mailman/listinfo/developers-public
>>
>> Unsubscribe:
>> https://secure.mysociety.org/admin/lists/mailman/options/developers-public/paul%40idltd.com
>>
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> developers-public mailing list
> [email protected]
> https://secure.mysociety.org/admin/lists/mailman/listinfo/developers-public
>
> Unsubscribe:
> https://secure.mysociety.org/admin/lists/mailman/options/developers-public/colm%40truthmonkey.org
>
_______________________________________________
developers-public mailing list
[email protected]
https://secure.mysociety.org/admin/lists/mailman/listinfo/developers-public

Unsubscribe: 
https://secure.mysociety.org/admin/lists/mailman/options/developers-public/archive%40mail-archive.com

Reply via email to