2012/2/7 Colm Howard-Lloyd <[email protected]>:
> I don't think referring to anyone as as a minion will endear you to them,
> but I digress...
>
> The guidance they've discovered may be Section 193 of the Licensing Act
> where 'working day' is defined
> http://www.legislation.gov.uk/ukpga/2003/17/section/193
>
> The clearest guidance is in the accompanying Guidelines to the Act.  This
> PDF, page 56, paragraph 7.19.
> http://www.homeoffice.gov.uk/publications/alcohol/guidance-section-182-licensing?view=Binary

Those guidelines do not have statutory force. In other words they may
tell you how an organisation thinks it should behave but they are no
more useful to you in court than my views set out in my earlier email.
Thankfully the government does not, as a general rule, get to say what
legislation means.

As I hoped I'd made clear, there's absolutely no doubt about what the
time requirement means in this context. The notice must be given on
day X for an event to take place on day X + 11, where non-working days
do not count.

The difference of opinion is whether it can be said that you have
given - by leaving the notice at the offices of the council - the
notice on day X where that notice was sent by email. My view - that is
what I expect a court would decide - is that sending an email on
Sunday is not "leaving" the notice at the offices on that day. A
normal person - where this list is not by any stretch of the
imagination normal - would almost certainly not think it meant that.

To be pedantic - you do not even know that the notice is present at
the council's offices if their mail server is not located there (and
depending on the mail user agents in use by the council).

In some other contexts there are rules about deemed service of emails.
Not so here.

-- 
Francis Davey

_______________________________________________
developers-public mailing list
[email protected]
https://secure.mysociety.org/admin/lists/mailman/listinfo/developers-public

Unsubscribe: 
https://secure.mysociety.org/admin/lists/mailman/options/developers-public/archive%40mail-archive.com

Reply via email to