2016-10-12 1:37 GMT+09:00 Dejan Muhamedagic <deja...@fastmail.fm>:
> Hi Lars,
> On Mon, Oct 10, 2016 at 05:42:12PM +0200, Lars Ellenberg wrote:
>> On Mon, Oct 10, 2016 at 12:07:48PM +0200, Kristoffer Grönlund wrote:
>> > Adam Spiers <aspi...@suse.com> writes:
>> > > Kristoffer Gronlund <kgronl...@suse.com> wrote:
>> > >> We've discussed moving cluster-glue to github.com and the ClusterLabs
>> > >> organization, but no one has actually done it yet. ;)
>> > >
>> > > Out of curiosity what needs to be done for this, other than the
>> > > obvious "git push" to github, and maybe updating a README / wiki page
>> > > or two?
>> > >
>> > The main thing would be to ensure that everyone who maintains it agrees
>> > to the move. AFAIK at least Lars Ellenberg and Dejan are both in favor,
>> > but I am not sure who else might be considered an owner of
>> > cluster-glue.
>> Appart from LINBIT, SuSE is the only relevant entity here, I'd say.
>> We are apparently the only ones that (still) ship cluster-glue.
> Debian? Ubuntu? Probably some others too, there's a zillion of
> Linux distros :)
>> The only relevant commits in the last six years have been from Linbit
>> (almost exclusively me), or from SuSE (almost exclusively by Dejan), in
>> part inspired or on behalf of work or contributions by NTT.
>> Apart from a few cosmetic patches, the only changes have been to
>> "hb_report" (which pacemaker feels is obsoleted by crm_report, which
>> was a fork of hb_report; probably any feature in hb_report that is not
>> (yet/anymore) in crm_report could and should be merged back, and
>> hb_report be dropped; maybe that has already happened).
>> Now, with Dejan no longer being SuSE, that probably leaves lge, lmb, and
>> krig to "agree" on anything there.
> What about NTT?
NTT also agrees on the moving to github, just for the record. I find
that the repo has been already moved though.
> Also, even if I'm not with suse, I'm still
> around. Though sometimes I do wonder what for ;-}
That's a surprising news to me:)
Developers mailing list