Hi, unfortunately we are not in an ideal world.
We are all working in an open source environment and on a common target with making HA reliant, easy to use and better than yesterday. But we are not working on a single bench. I wonder if the real issue is about missing context for a changelog/commit entry, the link to an external information resource, or the link to a hidden information source? > (e.g., I don't understand why the explanation did not go into > the commit itself in case of For me this sounds like the issue is missing context in the commit/change log and the need to pull another source to understand what something is about. (of course, it is annoying the other source isn't available for whatever reason). I don't see an issue by having a tracking tag (which by my non-engineering view it is). But by missing context. Bottom line, for me it sounds like demand for more verbal notes to commits, so there is no need to access information outside of the commit itself. As said, I'm not a developer anymore, so if it does not fit development standards, please let me know (privately, so I can learn from it). Best regards, kai
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
_______________________________________________ Developers mailing list Developers@clusterlabs.org http://lists.clusterlabs.org/mailman/listinfo/developers
