Kristoffer Gronlund <kgronl...@suse.com> wrote:
Adam Spiers <aspi...@suse.com> writes:
Kristoffer Gronlund <kgronl...@suse.com> wrote:
On 07/06/18 08:48 +0200, Kristoffer Grönlund wrote:
Jan Pokorný <jpoko...@redhat.com> writes:
So GitLab has a problem that AFAIK even GitHub didn't have, where
certain crucial features are only in the enterprise edition -
You're portraying GitLab as worse than GitHub here, but your logic is
backwards ;-) *All* of GitHub's functionality is non-libre, whereas
only certain features of GitLab are.
Ah, I wasn't talking about license problems but feature parity.
Ah, I see ;-)
My glance through the list of features only found in the enterprise edition
made me think that the open version lacks some features that github
currently has.
That would be a reasonable guess, but actually I don't think it's
particularly true because GitLab actually has much wider scope than
GitHub. IIUC GitHub relies heavily on third party integrations for a
lot of the stuff which GitLab is either bundling in CE or EE.
Regarding licensing, the announcement about enabling additional features
for open source projects seems to conflate Free as in Libre with free
as in no one is getting paid, which is a bit concerning...
Indeed.
Anyway, I'm not *against* GitLab, I'm just not convinced it's worth
moving to the hosted version due to concerns with the future of GitHub.
Yeah, I suspect a lot of the recent migrations have been just to
demonstrate a point about how people view Microsoft, rather than
driven from any genuine practical concerns. If they cared that much
about using libre SaaS they wouldn't have been using GitHub in the
first place ...
_______________________________________________
Developers mailing list
Developers@clusterlabs.org
https://lists.clusterlabs.org/mailman/listinfo/developers
