Nils Carlson <pyssl...@ludd.ltu.se> writes: > Adding some info as these are things I know something about. > > Gitlab & Github are very similar, but I much prefer Gitlab after having > used both.
Thank you, that was really useful information! I really like the idea of being able to limit merge requests to particular branches. One thing I've thought would be nice for resource-agents would be to redirect contributions to a special branch, because it's sometimes frustrating that a request has to be groomed into acceptability by the submitter without them knowing that it will ever be included. If there was a "staging area" for contributions where the maintainers can help with tweaking commit messages etc. for contributions that are going to be accepted but need some work, that might get some things into the repository that tend to get stuck with the github PR model. The code review features sound useful as well, especially being able to compare with previous versions. The github model of force pushing over the last request really isn't great for tracking what's happening to a pull request. Cheers, Kristoffer -- // Kristoffer Grönlund // kgronl...@suse.com _______________________________________________ Developers mailing list Developers@clusterlabs.org https://lists.clusterlabs.org/mailman/listinfo/developers
