Martijn Houtman wrote: > Thanks, so it seems not very handy to have a separate committers list. > No. The committer list is for issues we would formally direct to the MMC. This was a request to 'reopen' a project, which I figured would be such an issue.
> I did some research and also considered Kupu. I have the impression that > FCKEditor is more promising. I tried out for both the JavaScript version. If > I look at the source text in Kupu it appears to be HTML and not XHTML. Kupu > does change every tag to capitals, which is not valid XHTML, while FCKEditor > does it right, it does even change the <P> tags inserted by hand in the > source to <p>. Furthermore, it seems that FCKEditor has more editing > possibilities. I did not notice that Kupu produced capitals, it doesn't as far as I know. > May be someone can give me a reason why Kupu is a better choice? What I > understand is that the developers are more CMS oriented and Kupu is used in > Wiki and Plone sites, but I see also that Plone and Wiki sites currently are > implementing FCKEditor. I liked kupu becacuse of the extensibility and I could sufficently easily switch off features, and most importantly it has 'drawers'. The most important thing I searched for is the possibility to make in-text links to mmbase objects. I don't want feature bloat, and more editing possibilities. Smileys, colors, forms, buttons, skins, etc, I'd prefer not to have in an editor, at least not for now.. But I did not look into fckeditor into much detail yet, I needed something what would do the job, and kupu seemed helpful, and used in several other CMS's already. Michiel -- Michiel Meeuwissen mihxil' Mediacentrum 140 H'sum [] () +31 (0)35 6772979 nl_NL eo_XX en_US _______________________________________________ Developers mailing list [email protected] http://lists.mmbase.org/mailman/listinfo/developers
