Michiel Meeuwissen wrote:
At least I cannot think of even one actual concrete problem with that.
Perhaps the only one is that it would slighty increase the size of
mmbase.jar with a few bytes, but come on, really, we can't seriously call
_that_ an important issue.
That is not what is see as the issue.
My issue is that, by including all kinds of non-core implementations,
you do not actually create a 'Core' MMBase, but a 'Junk' MMBase.
You cannot draw a line if you include these 'example' classes.
It's a matter of design choice, and I think that it is worth discussing.
If people think design and architrectural choices are not worth
discussing, then I wonder why we have this list at all?
Gomez
_______________________________________________
Developers mailing list
[email protected]
http://lists.mmbase.org/mailman/listinfo/developers
