Pierre van Rooden wrote: > Michiel Meeuwissen wrote: > > >At least I cannot think of even one actual concrete problem with that. > >Perhaps the only one is that it would slighty increase the size of > >mmbase.jar with a few bytes, but come on, really, we can't seriously call > >_that_ an important issue. > > > > > That is not what is see as the issue. > My issue is that, by including all kinds of non-core implementations, > you do not actually create a 'Core' MMBase, but a 'Junk' MMBase. > You cannot draw a line if you include these 'example' classes.
> It's a matter of design choice, and I think that it is worth discussing. > If people think design and architrectural choices are not worth > discussing, then I wonder why we have this list at all? We can decide to move such classes (but then _all_ such classes) to a seperate app. Though I dont' really see the point even then, I don't disagree. You can't critize Andre on that though, he just follows current practice. Michiel -- Michiel Meeuwissen mihxil' Mediacentrum 140 H'sum [] () +31 (0)35 6772979 nl_NL eo_XX en_US _______________________________________________ Developers mailing list [email protected] http://lists.mmbase.org/mailman/listinfo/developers
