On 5/12/06, Henk Hangyi <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Hi Kees,
> It never felt right to extend Builder to add functionality.
Why not? It is great fun and very valuable both from a theoretical as
well as a practical point of view.
Can you elaborate on that?
For me it's a lot of work to accomplish a very small gain. functions
have been reworked every mmbase relase. And even OO wise I don't know
if it's theoretically a good thing since moost functions apply on a
field. Other functions like the ones in MMImage Are even worse IMHO
since they perform operations on different node types (images and
caches). and even have different implementations,
MyImageConverter.convert(image,template);
v.s
image.getFunctionValue("cache",template);
is not such a bigg deal
greetings
_______________________________________________
Developers mailing list
[email protected]
http://lists.mmbase.org/mailman/listinfo/developers
