> For me it's a lot of work to accomplish a very small gain. functions
> have been reworked every mmbase relase. And even OO wise I don't know
> if it's theoretically a good thing since moost functions apply on a
> field.
In 1.8 it is quite good though, I think. It is quite easy to plug in
or modify functionality. Using only the builder XML you can heavily
modifiy the behaviour of fields, and add functions to the node. That can
be done with precooked functionality, but you can always specify
explicit classes too, which are then quite straigh-forward and
reuseable. We must perhaps document this a bit better still.
Yes, I think this is a great thing. (I haven't used it much yet).
_______________________________________________
Developers mailing list
[email protected]
http://lists.mmbase.org/mailman/listinfo/developers
