Kees Jongenburger wrote:
On 5/12/06, Ernst Bunders <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Kees Jongenburger wrote:
>> -Hybernate is better in performance but less flexible in it's
datamodel
>> approach.
>
> it's the opposite
you mean it's performace is worse but it is more flexible?????
Sorry , I was talking about the flexible datamodel. Hybernate is more
flexible in it's data model.
It can even use existing database. wana try modeling the mmbase model
in hybernate ?
This is exactly the point in which MMbase and Hibernate made different
design choices. The hibernate guys will tell you never to use
many-to-many relations anywhere. There is always a better alternative.
MMbase uses many-to-many relations everywhere. But they both solve the
persisitency problem
Nico
_______________________________________________
Developers mailing list
[email protected]
http://lists.mmbase.org/mailman/listinfo/developers
