This is exactly the point in which MMbase and Hibernate made different
design choices. The hibernate guys will tell you never to use
many-to-many relations anywhere. There is always a better alternative.
MMbase uses many-to-many relations everywhere. But they both solve the
persisitency problem
Yes. I haven't really managed to good bidireactional  many-to-many
mappings in hybernate. I think mostly because I don't know how to
model that in OO terms. I think in MMBase terms having a thing like a
RelatedNode disscussed presiously would come close to what I would
call perfect. In the current MMBase you still have to choose between
getting the relation or the related node or the custernode.
_______________________________________________
Developers mailing list
[email protected]
http://lists.mmbase.org/mailman/listinfo/developers

Reply via email to