Nico Klasens <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > [X] +1 (YEA) > > Fix this yesterday, but then the way Pierre mentioned. Every mmbase > instance has only one jdbc datastore so there is no need for the use of > a hashtable. And is a hashtable not a little slower then a HashMap, > because it has synchronized methods? The url outcome is always the same > so there is no real issue when multiple threads add the thing.
I think the whole issue is only an implementation detail which cannot change functionality, and a vote is a bit overdone. But I'd be +1 for this change. Michiel -- Michiel Meeuwissen Mediapark C101 Hilversum +31 (0)35 6772979 nl_NL eo_XX en_US mihxil' [] ()
