On Mon, 2003-11-17 at 10:46, Michiel Meeuwissen wrote: > I think the whole issue is only an implementation detail which cannot change > functionality, and a vote is a bit overdone. > But I'd be +1 for this change. same here
- Re: Vote: Applications 1 Full Backup export extensio... Michiel Meeuwissen
- Re: Vote: Applications 1 Full Backup export extensio... Daniel Ockeloen
- Re: Vote: Applications 1 Full Backup export extensio... Rico Jansen
- RE: Vote: Applications 1 Full Backup export extensio... Nico Klasens
- HACK: MMBase 1.6 and 1.7: Performance: JDBC cache Marcel Maatkamp
- Re: HACK: MMBase 1.6 and 1.7: Performance: JDBC... Pierre van Rooden
- Re: MMBase 1.6 and 1.7: Performance: JDBC cache Rico Jansen
- RE: HACK: MMBase 1.6 and 1.7: Performance: JDBC... Nico Klasens
- Re: HACK: MMBase 1.6 and 1.7: Performance: ... Rob Vermeulen
- Re: HACK: MMBase 1.6 and 1.7: Performance: ... Michiel Meeuwissen
- Re: MMBase 1.6 and 1.7: Performance: JD... Eduard Witteveen
- Re: MMBase 1.6 and 1.7: Performance: JDBC cache Vincent van der Locht
- RE: HACK: MMBase 1.6 and 1.7: Performance: JDBC... Rob van Maris
- CALL ENDS: MMBase 1.6 and 1.7: Performance: JDB... Pierre van Rooden
- Re: Vote: Applications 1 Full Backup export extensio... eduard
- Re: Vote: Applications 1 Full Backup export ext... Eduard Witteveen
- BuilderWriter Pierre van Rooden
- RE: Vote: Applications 1 Full Backup export... Rob van Maris
- RE: Vote: Applications 1 Full Backup ex... Eduard Witteveen
- Re: Applications 1 Full Backup export extension Vincent van der Locht
- RE: Vote: Applications 1 Full Backup export extensio... Rob van Maris
