Pierre van Rooden wrote:

Asking for more info may be reason to -1, but to VETO you need to supply a proper reason why this change would be _unacceptable_.
You probably have one so please provide it in clear terms.
I have not yet seen an explanation other than "I don't understand this change", which not enough reason for a VETO.

Is this the vision of the MMC of the person writing this email? I personally find a lack of explaination enough reason for for using a veto.
(Maybe we need an EXPLAIN option, which has an blocking affect on the vote)


And about my vote, im thinking ;) (something like 2 implementations, leave the old one, create a new application based one)

Reply via email to