Gerard van Enk <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > >Ok, I think I agree. So we should somehow advice to place mail.jar and > >activation.jar in common/lib (if you use SendMail). > > > > +1.
Remain the questions how, where and who. > > >I think the xml-parser is 'endorsed' by jdk1.4 as well, and the xml-parsers > >shipped by tomcat and jdk are working for us, so we don't need to ship > >xerces and xml-apis anymore. Right? > > > > Is this also true for other servlet-engines than tomcat-5? Since we require jdk1.4, I think this implies that we also have an xml-parser automaticly, isn't it? Not sure about XPath yet (used in e.g. xml context security) > >Er, how about xalan then? > > > > Is everything working without xalan? I don't know. We do need an xsl-tranformer for editwizards at least, and xalan seems to be shipped in jdk's rt.jar, but I don't really understand its status. I think it is an 'endorsed' feature of jdk 1.4 as well? Michiel -- Michiel Meeuwissen Mediapark C101 Hilversum +31 (0)35 6772979 nl_NL eo_XX en_US mihxil' [] ()
